Why I Stopped Paying for 5 Separate AI Subscriptions and Consolidated Into One
If you build content or side projects with AI tools, you've probably hit this exact problem: one subscription for image generation, another for video, another for voice, another for upscaling, another for music. Each one is $20-$30/month on its own, and most months you're barely using half of what you're paying for. I did the math on my own stack a while back and it wasn't pretty — close to $120/month across five tools, most of which sat idle outside of a couple of active project weeks. Recurrin
If you build content or side projects with AI tools, you've probably hit this exact problem: one subscription for image generation, another for video, another for voice, another for upscaling, another for music. Each one is $20-$30/month on its own, and most months you're barely using half of what you're paying for.
I did the math on my own stack a while back and it wasn't pretty — close to $120/month across five tools, most of which sat idle outside of a couple of active project weeks.
The subscription math nobody talks about
Recurring AI subscriptions make sense if you're using a tool daily at scale. They make a lot less sense if your usage is bursty — a heavy week for a client project, then nothing for three weeks. You're still paying full price during the quiet weeks.
A few things I started tracking:
- Idle-month cost: what am I paying in months I don't touch the tool at all?
- Cross-tool friction: how much time do I lose exporting from one tool and re-uploading to the next?
- Feature overlap: how many of these five tools are doing basically the same job with different branding?
That last one was the real eye-opener. Image generation, upscaling, and video generation increasingly overlap in what they need under the hood (diffusion models, similar compute patterns), but most products still sell them as separate SKUs with separate subscriptions.
What I switched to
I moved my workflow to a single workspace that bundles image, video, voice, and upscaling behind one credit pool instead of one subscription per tool. The credits are a one-time purchase rather than recurring, which fixes the idle-month problem directly — unused credits don't expire, so a quiet month doesn't cost anything extra.
For anyone curious what that setup looks like in practice: Kenerateai
Is this the right move for everyone?
Honestly, no. If you're generating hundreds of assets a day at production scale, a flat monthly subscription with unlimited (or very high) usage caps might still work out cheaper per-unit than a credit system. This consolidation mainly pays off for:
- Solo devs and indie hackers with bursty, project-based usage
- Anyone currently paying for 3+ separate AI tools with overlapping features
- People who lose time re-uploading assets between disconnected tools
The actual takeaway
Before adding another AI subscription to your stack, it's worth auditing what you're already paying for and whether the tools overlap enough to consolidate. In my case, cutting from five subscriptions to one credit pool didn't just save money — it removed a chunk of workflow friction I hadn't really noticed until it was gone.
Curious if others have gone through a similar audit — what did your stack look like before/after?
